Search Results
7/24/2025, 3:43:30 AM
The Bannon tapes aren't interviews, and it's unlikely he'll be able to trim them down into anything that will reflect positively on Bannon. Their ownership is also in question, since Epstein foot the bill.
>The interview never took place — some PR rehabs are just too daunting — but for months now, Bannon has been publicly promoting that footage of his erstwhile friend — 12 to 15 hours, by his own count — as the foundation of a planned docuseries, working title The Monster. He’s been pitching it as journalism, a raw look inside Epstein’s pathology. In fact, though, those tapings seem to have been far from journalistic.
>According to author Michael Wolff, who was there for the first taping and reviewed transcripts of others — and who first revealed the existence of these tapes in his 2021 book Too Famous — the point wasn’t exposure. It was spin. “There’s no question the tapes were media training,” he tells THR. “And there’s no possible way Epstein would have signed off on them being used in a documentary.”
>That context — his alleged financial arrangement with Epstein, the coaching role he played, the purpose of the tapings — has been conspicuously absent from Bannon’s own public commentary about the Epstein scandal over the past few months. The onetime Trump advisor has been among the most vociferous critics of Epstein and has loudly denounced the administration for its refusal to release the Epstein files.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/jeffrey-epstein-steve-bannon-1236325072/
For further context, we have the guy who wrote the foreword for Alex Jonestein's book, and the source of Trump's Palin-esque populist facade doing media training for a Mossad pedophile.
>The interview never took place — some PR rehabs are just too daunting — but for months now, Bannon has been publicly promoting that footage of his erstwhile friend — 12 to 15 hours, by his own count — as the foundation of a planned docuseries, working title The Monster. He’s been pitching it as journalism, a raw look inside Epstein’s pathology. In fact, though, those tapings seem to have been far from journalistic.
>According to author Michael Wolff, who was there for the first taping and reviewed transcripts of others — and who first revealed the existence of these tapes in his 2021 book Too Famous — the point wasn’t exposure. It was spin. “There’s no question the tapes were media training,” he tells THR. “And there’s no possible way Epstein would have signed off on them being used in a documentary.”
>That context — his alleged financial arrangement with Epstein, the coaching role he played, the purpose of the tapings — has been conspicuously absent from Bannon’s own public commentary about the Epstein scandal over the past few months. The onetime Trump advisor has been among the most vociferous critics of Epstein and has loudly denounced the administration for its refusal to release the Epstein files.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/jeffrey-epstein-steve-bannon-1236325072/
For further context, we have the guy who wrote the foreword for Alex Jonestein's book, and the source of Trump's Palin-esque populist facade doing media training for a Mossad pedophile.
Page 1