>>512261881
>But this post is a distraction, pointing peoples attention away from his genealogy work.
This is probably the most absurd thing you've written in this thread so far, and that's saying a lot. You either intentionally or unintentionally missed the point of my post completely. My point is, these physics and math issues are not fucking rocket science, especially calculus as one of the most basic building blocks to having an understanding of physics. To even have the gall or the wherewithal to write hundreds of articles on physics "disproving" basic concepts without even knowing calculus is fucking incredible. To get it wrong hundreds of times over is unforgivable. This is a pattern of stupidity and intellectual laziness that can't be ignored.

You're really telling me, despite his literal mountain of laughably garbage articles, that I should trust him on genealogy? Like this is the one thing he managed to study perfectly and magically came to the correct conclusion? Lol. Lmao, even