Search Results
7/15/2025, 4:22:21 AM
>>510396185
>This church however... looks EXACTLY the same as in 1100.
How do you know that? Looks 19th Century to me. We have a problem of that here where churches claimed to be 13th or 14th Century turn out to be 19th. St. Patrick's, Patrington for one.
1100AD is basically prehistoric. What are the markers for that which you are going off? There should also be considerable wear from the elements and alterations due to changing religious fashions. Got any of that or are we talking one 19th Century architect with a beautiful design?
See picrel Patrington one design no wear, built on top of raised up graveyard but the ground has not raised up around the door. Graveyards rise over time due to the bodies buried there so if the church is on top of the uplift or there is no uplift it is a lot newer than claimed.
>This church however... looks EXACTLY the same as in 1100.
How do you know that? Looks 19th Century to me. We have a problem of that here where churches claimed to be 13th or 14th Century turn out to be 19th. St. Patrick's, Patrington for one.
1100AD is basically prehistoric. What are the markers for that which you are going off? There should also be considerable wear from the elements and alterations due to changing religious fashions. Got any of that or are we talking one 19th Century architect with a beautiful design?
See picrel Patrington one design no wear, built on top of raised up graveyard but the ground has not raised up around the door. Graveyards rise over time due to the bodies buried there so if the church is on top of the uplift or there is no uplift it is a lot newer than claimed.
Page 1