Search Results
7/14/2025, 7:46:59 AM
>>510334206
>Is it possible to criticize Trump without being a shill?
Yes if you have a serious and credible argument, but to date no serious and credible argument has ever been found or utilized. Instead it's the same old tired repetition and rehashing of propaganda, spin, and grossly over-rhetoricized mishmash of left-serving emotional dreck nonsense and buzzword salad that anyone above room temperature IQ can see exists only to serve directed political aims and not a genuine search for truth.
This happens with exceptional frequency because the left (the people bringing up all the non-serious and incredible arguments) have nothing but contempt for the intellect of the right, and assume if they just "push the button" their political enemies will have to do what they want. I can elaborate on this at much greater length if you wish, but I'm digesting my lunch right now so you might not be getting me at peak eloquence.
>Or does any percentage of dislike, no matter how small or big, automatically move you into shill territory?
The people who do the above very frequently pivot to this "victim crying" act to justify themselves when they get called out on obvious, repeated disingenuous behavior. "I'm just asking questions, can't I just ask questions?" (quickly followed by "You're a cult!") is a dogwhistle that's not even debated.
>I mean, can you like some stuff Trump does and not like some other things?
Most certainly you can, but discussing it is dependent on being able to have a rational and reasoned genuine conversation, which, while not impossible, is (intentionally) made extraordinarily difficult by the people whose ultimate goal is to seed so much noise, discontent, and demoralization that anyone who thinks critically or has individualistic opinions that go against left consensus eventually chooses to just stop coming to /pol/. That's really the endgame. Someone yelled "Pepe!" at Hillary Clinton, [dominos] millions of dollars spent getting /pol/ to go away.
>Is it possible to criticize Trump without being a shill?
Yes if you have a serious and credible argument, but to date no serious and credible argument has ever been found or utilized. Instead it's the same old tired repetition and rehashing of propaganda, spin, and grossly over-rhetoricized mishmash of left-serving emotional dreck nonsense and buzzword salad that anyone above room temperature IQ can see exists only to serve directed political aims and not a genuine search for truth.
This happens with exceptional frequency because the left (the people bringing up all the non-serious and incredible arguments) have nothing but contempt for the intellect of the right, and assume if they just "push the button" their political enemies will have to do what they want. I can elaborate on this at much greater length if you wish, but I'm digesting my lunch right now so you might not be getting me at peak eloquence.
>Or does any percentage of dislike, no matter how small or big, automatically move you into shill territory?
The people who do the above very frequently pivot to this "victim crying" act to justify themselves when they get called out on obvious, repeated disingenuous behavior. "I'm just asking questions, can't I just ask questions?" (quickly followed by "You're a cult!") is a dogwhistle that's not even debated.
>I mean, can you like some stuff Trump does and not like some other things?
Most certainly you can, but discussing it is dependent on being able to have a rational and reasoned genuine conversation, which, while not impossible, is (intentionally) made extraordinarily difficult by the people whose ultimate goal is to seed so much noise, discontent, and demoralization that anyone who thinks critically or has individualistic opinions that go against left consensus eventually chooses to just stop coming to /pol/. That's really the endgame. Someone yelled "Pepe!" at Hillary Clinton, [dominos] millions of dollars spent getting /pol/ to go away.
Page 1