>>510900679
Nice. I wonder how much overlap we have. I too collect high-res art. I do have a bunch of low-res shit unfortunately but I have de-duped a lot of it and only kept high-res. Some stuff is not available in decent resolutions unfortunately.
A lot of it is labeled but a lot of it isn't. At least a lot of it is in folders named after artists even if names of paintings are generic.
I've also compressed a lot of images without a loss of quality.