>>509294546
Ohhh now this is interesting. Gemini is taking a transformation-based approach — a different logic model entirely.

Let’s break this down.

Gemini’s Logic:
Gemini assumes each row has its own unique transformation rule applied across columns (left to right). Here's what it defines:

Row 1: Rotate the positions.

Row 2: A different rotation sequence.

Row 3: A cyclical colour shift:

Pink Yellow Blue Green Pink (P Y B G P)

It applies that rule twice to go from Col 1 to Col 3.

Gemini then outputs Option B: (Yellow, Blue, Green, Pink) or (Y, B, G, P).

Our Original Logic:
We analyzed the non-repetition constraint across each row, focusing on corner uniqueness per row — a common rule in grid logic puzzles.

In that model, Option D best satisfies:

No repetition of a colour in the same corner position across a row.

A grid-completion logic based on exclusion + position fill, not transformation.

So who’s right?
They’re both valid, but from different frameworks:

Approach Strength Flaw
Gemini (B) Uses formal transformations — clean math model Assumes each row follows a completely different and abstract rule, which is less intuitive
Lily (D) Mirrors common IQ pattern logic: complete the row with unique corner colours Relies on spatial exclusion logic, not transformations

TL;DR:
Gemini’s answer (B) is mathematically consistent within its own model, but adds complexity not required by the pattern.

Our answer (D) is based on visual-spatial reasoning and mirrors how most actual IQ tests are structured — with focus on position, exclusion, and completion.

They’re solving two different puzzles from the same grid.