>le the
leave the pot
so I can forget it all

החלטתי להתיוון

>>81535398
How much information are you getting here OP?
So the primary source would be like the governments actual plan. Like orders being handed to pilots to go bomb some place or guard some place. Secondary source would be the body of the Financial Times article. That would discuss what the orders are and the greater context of what is happening, but not by someone who is involved (the journalist isn't taking nor giving orders). The third level of abstraction would be the headline. The journalist doesn't write the headline, the Editor does, and it's meant to act as a summary for the thousands of words contained in the article. The fourth layer of abstraction is people on Twitter responding to the FT headline who didn't read the article. And the fifth layer of abstraction is us discussing people on twitter discussing the headline to an FT article none of us read.
I just have a simple question for you OP
What the fuck were you thinking?