Search Results
ID: br2Rl6nE/pol/507290127#507291804
6/14/2025, 3:24:58 AM
>>507291227
Israel repeatedly commits warcrime
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations, during peace talks, could violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions, and customary rules of war. Below
UN arter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble.
Israel repeatedly commits warcrime
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations, during peace talks, could violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions, and customary rules of war. Below
UN arter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble.
6/14/2025, 2:23:44 AM
>>507284366
>even if Trumpstein had nothing to do with this attack (he did) Americans are going to die anyway because Trump is such a fucking kike the Iranians simply refuse to believe he wasn't involved
Kek
>even if Trumpstein had nothing to do with this attack (he did) Americans are going to die anyway because Trump is such a fucking kike the Iranians simply refuse to believe he wasn't involved
Kek
Page 1