>>510763613
I think it might be because as part of the defamation Greenwich was probably playing the victim card. It might not be the akshull parliamentary privilege piece.

>>510763901
gallery-dl it yourself.
https://coomer.su/onlyfans/user/bondicumslut
https://bunkr.cr/a/12U7z6KR

>>508149036
That's a bit homophobic anon.
>It has called this world-first the "plasma pathway", and says it will mean "most people, including gay and bisexual men, and anyone who takes PrEP, will be able to donate plasma without a wait period, providing they meet all other eligibility criteria".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/red-cross-loosens-rules-for-lgbtqia-plasma-donation/105430414

>Mr Greenwich referred to Mr Latham as a "disgusting human being" and in reply, Mr Latham took to Twitter, now X, to say: "Disgusting How does that compare with …" before describing sexual activity in graphic terms.
>Mr Greenwich's counsel, Prue Bindon, told the tribunal each of the statements constituted both unlawful homosexual vilification and sexual harassment.
>Ms Bindon said the "crude, explicit language" of the statements to describe the presumed sexual acts of Mr Greenwich was "designed to promote severe disgust or strong aversion".
>The defamation proceedings resulted in Mr Latham being ordered to pay $140,000 for non-economic loss and aggravated damages, and substantial costs.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-16/mark-latham-alex-greenwich-at-ncat-alleged-unlawful-comments/105423308