Search Results
7/3/2025, 8:47:53 PM
>>509418551
>>509418592
There's this misconception arising from neurosis and ignorance that feminine = weak, masculine = strong.
No, masculine = STRONGER, not strong, in SOME species because strength is a positive indicator of health. It is a positive indicator of health for both sexes, however. Attraction to weak traits is exceptionally dysgenic.
No, Germanic women were not stronger than Germanic men. The weakest man 100 years ago could kill every single groyper with his bare hands without even breaking a sweat.
>>509418592
There's this misconception arising from neurosis and ignorance that feminine = weak, masculine = strong.
No, masculine = STRONGER, not strong, in SOME species because strength is a positive indicator of health. It is a positive indicator of health for both sexes, however. Attraction to weak traits is exceptionally dysgenic.
No, Germanic women were not stronger than Germanic men. The weakest man 100 years ago could kill every single groyper with his bare hands without even breaking a sweat.
Page 1