>>105934556
What does that mean?
>>105934925
Performance per Watt.
The x86S idea by Intel wasn't bad per-say. They should leave one "legacy" core in place for all the old shit (the entire x86 schtick is that it is backwards compatible as fuck) and rice the fuck out of the rest.
Add a good helping of opening up x86S for licensing production like arm does and they would beat arm into the dirt.