Search Results
8/4/2025, 2:56:33 AM
Fahrenheit’s scale in superior to Celsius in basically every objective measure:
>instruments can be calibrated with basic human body and some ice water (some retard didn’t understand this genius and fucked with the system a couple hundred years ago so now you’ll be off by a whole 2 degrees)
>higher resolution, so you can be more precise without getting into fractions/decimals, consequently making it faster to communicate (eg. I can tell the difference between 70F and 72F, but in C this is 21.1 vs 22.2). This is useful when arguing over the thermostat.
In theory celsius can be just as accurate, but in practice no one uses decinals because it’s annoying.
>muh Science isn’t an argument, because you use Kelvin or Rankine for that
For all the other SI vs Imperial measurements you can make the argument that mathematical convenience trumps real-world practicality, but Celsius has worse real-world practicality AND worse mathematical practicality than Fahrenheit, so it’s a total loser.
>instruments can be calibrated with basic human body and some ice water (some retard didn’t understand this genius and fucked with the system a couple hundred years ago so now you’ll be off by a whole 2 degrees)
>higher resolution, so you can be more precise without getting into fractions/decimals, consequently making it faster to communicate (eg. I can tell the difference between 70F and 72F, but in C this is 21.1 vs 22.2). This is useful when arguing over the thermostat.
In theory celsius can be just as accurate, but in practice no one uses decinals because it’s annoying.
>muh Science isn’t an argument, because you use Kelvin or Rankine for that
For all the other SI vs Imperial measurements you can make the argument that mathematical convenience trumps real-world practicality, but Celsius has worse real-world practicality AND worse mathematical practicality than Fahrenheit, so it’s a total loser.
Page 1