Search Results
6/29/2025, 4:38:23 AM
>>280070560
Sorry to tell you, but that's wrong. Your numbers are off.
https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2023/02000/narrative_review_of_sex_differences_in_muscle.28.aspx
>Laubach (269) computed female upper-body strength to be 55.8% of male upper-body strength, female lower-body strength to be 71.9% of male lower-body strength
>The findings by Laubach (269) are fairly consistent with 45 years of subsequent research, which has shown that female upper-body strength is roughly 50–60% of male upper-body strength; female lower-body strength is roughly 60–70% of male lower-body strength
Those ranges are consistent with the numbers cited here >>280051936
Men having 90% more upper body strength means women's upper body strength is 1/1.9 = 52.6% that of men. Men having 65% more lower body strength means women's lower body strength is 1/1.65 = 60.6% that of men. Just use common sense. Are women squatting 93% of what men squat? Of course not.
>the real issue is the size
Yes, size is a big factor, but you're greatly underestimating gender differences. Men are built different biologically in many ways. An average man is still much stronger than an average woman at the same size.
>so a trained girl that is as tall as
Weight, not height.
>the girl will most likely fuck you up in a fight
Sure, a highly trained girl would beat an untrained loser neet the same size, but give the guy even a little bit of training and he'll fuck her up. We consistently see top female fighters lose to amateur male fighters in the same weight class. The gender gap is hard to overcome, even with training.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6614766_Hand-grip_strength_of_young_men_women_and_highly_trained_female_athletes
90% of females are weaker than 95% of males. Female athletes are weaker than 75% of males. Even female national elite athletes rarely surpass 50% of males. Here's a chart made from data from NHANES (different study) to put it in perspective visually.
Sorry to tell you, but that's wrong. Your numbers are off.
https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2023/02000/narrative_review_of_sex_differences_in_muscle.28.aspx
>Laubach (269) computed female upper-body strength to be 55.8% of male upper-body strength, female lower-body strength to be 71.9% of male lower-body strength
>The findings by Laubach (269) are fairly consistent with 45 years of subsequent research, which has shown that female upper-body strength is roughly 50–60% of male upper-body strength; female lower-body strength is roughly 60–70% of male lower-body strength
Those ranges are consistent with the numbers cited here >>280051936
Men having 90% more upper body strength means women's upper body strength is 1/1.9 = 52.6% that of men. Men having 65% more lower body strength means women's lower body strength is 1/1.65 = 60.6% that of men. Just use common sense. Are women squatting 93% of what men squat? Of course not.
>the real issue is the size
Yes, size is a big factor, but you're greatly underestimating gender differences. Men are built different biologically in many ways. An average man is still much stronger than an average woman at the same size.
>so a trained girl that is as tall as
Weight, not height.
>the girl will most likely fuck you up in a fight
Sure, a highly trained girl would beat an untrained loser neet the same size, but give the guy even a little bit of training and he'll fuck her up. We consistently see top female fighters lose to amateur male fighters in the same weight class. The gender gap is hard to overcome, even with training.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6614766_Hand-grip_strength_of_young_men_women_and_highly_trained_female_athletes
90% of females are weaker than 95% of males. Female athletes are weaker than 75% of males. Even female national elite athletes rarely surpass 50% of males. Here's a chart made from data from NHANES (different study) to put it in perspective visually.
Page 1