Search Results
6/29/2025, 4:28:55 PM
>>63912454
We've also said that for a lot of stuff that outpaced our wildest expectation once we had the tech-level to actually make them
We already have warship mounted lasers, it's only a matter of improving the tech until it destroy million dollar missiles 200km away.
Aside, we don't need a space-based laser to reach satellites, be it 300km up, or eventually thousands of kilometers up, it's just a question of energy.
>>63912462
At the level of energy we are talking about, it's not a cloud that will negate it.
Clouds also impede airfighter operation in the first place, pilots do NOT want to "dive into a cloud to hide". So even with our current cheapass lasers, it's more cost-efficient to have them in the long therm. Just not as your only method of interception.
We've also said that for a lot of stuff that outpaced our wildest expectation once we had the tech-level to actually make them
We already have warship mounted lasers, it's only a matter of improving the tech until it destroy million dollar missiles 200km away.
Aside, we don't need a space-based laser to reach satellites, be it 300km up, or eventually thousands of kilometers up, it's just a question of energy.
>>63912462
At the level of energy we are talking about, it's not a cloud that will negate it.
Clouds also impede airfighter operation in the first place, pilots do NOT want to "dive into a cloud to hide". So even with our current cheapass lasers, it's more cost-efficient to have them in the long therm. Just not as your only method of interception.
Page 1