>>457419
>natural
where did your rant about christian values suddenly go? we talking nature or the will of god? decide, maybe...?
what does 'unnatural' even mean? are humans and their behaviors not bound to their biology???
I don't get this kind of argument... if we are only allowed to do what the majority of animals does, then you should immediately turn off the internet, get rid of your clothes, neglect your ability to read or use complex grammar at all... oh, and stop using second degree tools like:
artificial lights
heating/cooking
sharpening utensils
guns
bows and arrows
looms
mills
canals
art
and anything else that required culture in order to even emerge...

>unnatural flag
how many of the flags out there are less abstract again?

>fags abusing children
not sure this is the case.
and even if so. the number probably decreases when gays are officially allowed to love each other and don't have to suppress sexual desires for all their lives.
seems fair to assume that rapes are negatively correlated with the degree of sexual liberation. like for example look fundamentalist/religious states. you wanna tell me they have lower numbers of child abuse than secular, liberal systems do??