Search Results
ID: ndbMWA3v/pol/507915121#507919102
6/19/2025, 1:42:11 AM
>>507915638
>BASED ISRAEL ALLOWING RUSSIANS TO LEAVE NUCLEAR PLANT BEFORE TRUMP BOMBS IT
LOL
THIS IS FUCKING AMAZING!!
HAHAHA
>BASED ISRAEL ALLOWING RUSSIANS TO LEAVE NUCLEAR PLANT BEFORE TRUMP BOMBS IT
LOL
THIS IS FUCKING AMAZING!!
HAHAHA
ID: pNAbb5Js/pol/507850098#507861024
6/18/2025, 4:38:33 PM
>>507858151
>why did donld trump complement netanyahu peace-time sucker-punch against iran on june 13th when he had a peace-talk scheduled for june 15th ?
>Because Trump is from NYC.
all east coast fags are satanic!
are you saying he sabotaged his intent toward peace because hes a new yorker?
i thinklil donnie was impatient and thinks just because he gave them a 60 day ultimatum he can encourage netanyahus warpath!
>why did donld trump complement netanyahu peace-time sucker-punch against iran on june 13th when he had a peace-talk scheduled for june 15th ?
>Because Trump is from NYC.
all east coast fags are satanic!
are you saying he sabotaged his intent toward peace because hes a new yorker?
i thinklil donnie was impatient and thinks just because he gave them a 60 day ultimatum he can encourage netanyahus warpath!
ID: /S1igemt/pol/507741176#507745869
6/17/2025, 7:16:41 PM
>>507741176
trump tlks about the military like a child playing with his fathers train-set
I hope he faces court scrutiny for his role in this!
trump tlks about the military like a child playing with his fathers train-set
I hope he faces court scrutiny for his role in this!
ID: llHvK95p/pol/507622306#507627451
6/16/2025, 9:56:04 PM
>>507623220
>what did he mean by this?
he is trying to imply that america will die if they dont aid him in his total assasination and coup di atat in replacing the regime!
typical war criminal, trumps best friend is bullying america
FUCK TRUMP! IMPEACH TRUMP!
I NO LONGER SUPPORT TRUMP DUE TO HIS ADMIRATION OF ISRAELA LETHAL ASSASSINATION IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW WITHOUT AUTHORITY!!
>what did he mean by this?
he is trying to imply that america will die if they dont aid him in his total assasination and coup di atat in replacing the regime!
typical war criminal, trumps best friend is bullying america
FUCK TRUMP! IMPEACH TRUMP!
I NO LONGER SUPPORT TRUMP DUE TO HIS ADMIRATION OF ISRAELA LETHAL ASSASSINATION IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW WITHOUT AUTHORITY!!
ID: otkEMNUD/pol/507602695#507605703
6/16/2025, 6:34:01 PM
TRUMP PROTECTS CRIMINALS AND WAR CRIMINALS!
International law, prohibits the use of force against a state's territorial integrity or political independence under Article 2(4), except in self-defense (Article 51) or with UN Security Council authorization. Israel's recent military strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear capabilities without a court sanction or UN approval, appear to lack a clear legal basis. For self-defense to be lawful, there must be an imminent or ongoing armed attack, but no evidence suggests Iran was actively attacking Israel at the time. Israel's preemptive action, based on perceived future threats like Iran's potential nuclear weapons, does not meet the strict threshold for lawful self-defense under international law, as noted by UN experts and legal analyses on X.
There is no indication of a court-ordered sanction or UN Security Council resolution permitting Israel’s surprise attack on Iran. Negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program were ongoing, further weakening the case for unilateral action. The UN and IAEA have condemned attacks on nuclear facilities due to risks of radioactive contamination and escalation, labeling them threats to global peace. Some legal perspectives classify such actions as potential "crimes of aggression" or violations of the right to life, especially if civilians were harmed, though this requires investigation by bodies like the ICC, which has not yet ruled.
Whether this constitutes a war crime depends on specifics—e.g., targeting civilians or causing disproportionate harm—violating the Geneva Conventions. Reports of civilian casualties in Iran raise concerns, but no formal legal judgment exists as of June 16, 2025. No court order authorizes Israel to diminish Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Thus, under current international law, Israel’s actions seem unlawful without UN approval or proof of an imminent threat, sparking debate about potential war crime status, though no definitive ruling has been made.
International law, prohibits the use of force against a state's territorial integrity or political independence under Article 2(4), except in self-defense (Article 51) or with UN Security Council authorization. Israel's recent military strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear capabilities without a court sanction or UN approval, appear to lack a clear legal basis. For self-defense to be lawful, there must be an imminent or ongoing armed attack, but no evidence suggests Iran was actively attacking Israel at the time. Israel's preemptive action, based on perceived future threats like Iran's potential nuclear weapons, does not meet the strict threshold for lawful self-defense under international law, as noted by UN experts and legal analyses on X.
There is no indication of a court-ordered sanction or UN Security Council resolution permitting Israel’s surprise attack on Iran. Negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program were ongoing, further weakening the case for unilateral action. The UN and IAEA have condemned attacks on nuclear facilities due to risks of radioactive contamination and escalation, labeling them threats to global peace. Some legal perspectives classify such actions as potential "crimes of aggression" or violations of the right to life, especially if civilians were harmed, though this requires investigation by bodies like the ICC, which has not yet ruled.
Whether this constitutes a war crime depends on specifics—e.g., targeting civilians or causing disproportionate harm—violating the Geneva Conventions. Reports of civilian casualties in Iran raise concerns, but no formal legal judgment exists as of June 16, 2025. No court order authorizes Israel to diminish Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Thus, under current international law, Israel’s actions seem unlawful without UN approval or proof of an imminent threat, sparking debate about potential war crime status, though no definitive ruling has been made.
Page 1