>>512578563
>weird how he hasnt been banned for posting porn yet, right
>tells you all you need to know about the board being ran by feds running cover for pedo prez
Yes
I've openly stated I'm running cover for elites who may have engaged in ephebophilic activity in the past.
It's better than helping the Democrats take power. At least Republicans don't support chopping the tits off teen girls

>>512490643
>Every famous actor/musician whatever through the ages until like 2010 would have underage girls around
Many of them still do.
Tate did nothing wrong