>>715792259
You called anthro "cartoon bestiality" (>>715787981) which is an accusation of zoophilia. I'm not sure what to make of your argument against parental controls. You're right that it's virtually impossible in our digital age to 100% ensure that a child won't stumble upon pornography for all the reasons you've given. Things used to be worse if you can believe it, so take solace in the fact that things are moving towards better safeguards. But I don't think it's fair to assume that anyone who's made R34 of kid-friendly media is doing so with the intent on tricking children into looking at it. Granted, some of these artists are irresponsible and publish their work on generally accessible websites, but many more hide their work behind content restrictions or paywalls and many go out of their way to dissuade minors from viewing their content. Are those people pedophiles? I don't think so. I'm going to very magnanimous and ignore that bit at the end about "evil liberal women" poisoning the youth by wearing bikinis at the beach, as it makes you sound crazy (no offense.)