Search Results
7/11/2025, 5:16:03 AM
>>510064699
Okay...fairplay I don't understand
>Computers exist as an abstraction for what time represents in a closed loop of differing communication signals
>There is nothing 'natural' about computers existing.
>At this point we can describe certain fixed constants, reliable by saying this 'controlled' medium is what is representative of a universe where upon you can say space travel could become viable
>at which point in time there is still a never-ending inequality crisis due to pre-existing monopolies ensuring that there is no modular scaling from affordable means of space exploration.
>If we can't describe reliable means to utilize the resources of other planets in our solar system there is no reason to decorate the situation with a differing assertion.
It hasn't even begun enjoyers still viable.
Okay...fairplay I don't understand
>Computers exist as an abstraction for what time represents in a closed loop of differing communication signals
>There is nothing 'natural' about computers existing.
>At this point we can describe certain fixed constants, reliable by saying this 'controlled' medium is what is representative of a universe where upon you can say space travel could become viable
>at which point in time there is still a never-ending inequality crisis due to pre-existing monopolies ensuring that there is no modular scaling from affordable means of space exploration.
>If we can't describe reliable means to utilize the resources of other planets in our solar system there is no reason to decorate the situation with a differing assertion.
It hasn't even begun enjoyers still viable.
Page 1