>>508898483
And I've seen you discussing the w*man question in multiple threads, always agreeing with your emphasis on denying the libido, reaching for highter purpose. You're naturally Schopenhauerian, that's why I sent you the recs and links.
>how are you coping
Intuitively, I got smacked in the face with foid cuntery even before turning 20. Intellectually, I had to find my way to philosophical literature expanding on what I've already felt but couldn't articulate. No masturbation now, much less paying any attention to real life w*men. Rejecting multiple advances in college still brings a proud smile to my face.
Best of luck in your fight against the monkey Will, friend.
>picrel: Otto Weininger - Sex and Character

>>508459054
>>508459242
Men have the capacity to transcend their sexuality, to become self-reliant and self-actualized beings powered by intellect. This isn't possible for a w*man, she'll always remain thoroughly sexual and nothing more. Without male attention to sustain her ego, w*man unironically becomes insane.
Some of the greatest minds in history lived their lives focused solely on their interests without distractions, and pretty much all the great minds throughout history considered w*men inferior beings.

>>507085649
Refer to Schopenhauer's insights here >>507084976
Or to Weininger's Geschlecht und Charakter in picrel