>>509848872
>not really the artists fault that rich jews scheme against them
It doesn't cost them much to open a twatter account, and even to pay to get a checkmark so their posts' reach in increased. Even paying the lowest fee for Google Adsense would already give them a nice boost in visibility. The amount of attention and commissions they would get this way would totally cover any investments they make. But noooooooo, better post on forums nobody visits, or on Faceberg which is inhabited only by boomers and the lowest of the third worlders, or other such retarded methods of advertising.
>It's obvious why AI slop is going to be a bad thing for artists
It's so obvious yet you don't explain it, how curious.
>AI slop isn't going to replace shitty modern art btw
It has. AI art is winning competitions left and right. The AI craze itself started all because an AI art won a modern art competition btw lol.
>and real artists will be less valued due to AI slop being "good enough"
Wrong.
AI is good enough to scratch the momentary itch, rarely and with much human input does it become appreciable enough to be saved for posterity.
Good artists still have a market because there are people who want something for posterity, thing is that there's very few good western artists, so most westerners chimp out at AI, because western artists see in AI what they could have painted and the attention and fame they could have gotten instead of kneeling to leftists and kikes, and western non-artists see what they could enjoy instead of this leftist kike shit they are forced to say they enjoy because of their goyim cattle background afraid of having an opinion that diverges from the status quo.
>World hasn't gotten any better
It has and it's a fact, talentless hacks will disagree though.