Search Results
6/8/2025, 6:16:28 PM
>>4433735
If you spend at least a small amount of time browsing gear or reviews, or whatever, you'll start to get a feel for it.
It's very hard to judge a lens' end-result (the photo) from mere metrics and stats, but there's generally some good indicators. If I were you I would just stick to things from your native mount(s) and do a little bit of research on what's currently sold and if there's any bangers that are discontinued. I would just buy "standard" consumer lenses used if I were you until you find you're unable to do X thing you wish you could.
For example, I recently picked up a 20 year-old pro EF zoom from Canon that I adapt that shits all over my recently (2 years ago) released RF native zoom. I spent more on the RF lens (and there are differences in the market-audience, specs, modern niceties like super effectve IS etc.), but the 20 year old lens is preem.
>pic rel
If you spend at least a small amount of time browsing gear or reviews, or whatever, you'll start to get a feel for it.
It's very hard to judge a lens' end-result (the photo) from mere metrics and stats, but there's generally some good indicators. If I were you I would just stick to things from your native mount(s) and do a little bit of research on what's currently sold and if there's any bangers that are discontinued. I would just buy "standard" consumer lenses used if I were you until you find you're unable to do X thing you wish you could.
For example, I recently picked up a 20 year-old pro EF zoom from Canon that I adapt that shits all over my recently (2 years ago) released RF native zoom. I spent more on the RF lens (and there are differences in the market-audience, specs, modern niceties like super effectve IS etc.), but the 20 year old lens is preem.
>pic rel
Page 1