Search Results
6/12/2025, 1:44:25 PM
>>17757307
Okay so you have basically used an analogy I made here >>17757229 for the A theory and repeated yourself for the B theory an analogy I accepted in my reply. What is the point of this post? Address what I have asked of you not this irrelevant nonsense reeking of dishonesty.
>still talking about mental states and illusions
lmao again it doesn't matter, you can literally program these subjective assumptions into an arduino to turn on an LED and somehow it would all still magically work from the observer's pov. How does it work if subjective experience is wrong? It does not change the fact that you as an observer must measure the fact that you traversed an infinite meaning you solved nothing.
Okay so you have basically used an analogy I made here >>17757229 for the A theory and repeated yourself for the B theory an analogy I accepted in my reply. What is the point of this post? Address what I have asked of you not this irrelevant nonsense reeking of dishonesty.
>still talking about mental states and illusions
lmao again it doesn't matter, you can literally program these subjective assumptions into an arduino to turn on an LED and somehow it would all still magically work from the observer's pov. How does it work if subjective experience is wrong? It does not change the fact that you as an observer must measure the fact that you traversed an infinite meaning you solved nothing.
Page 1