Search Results
7/25/2025, 9:51:25 PM
>>716430731
right that's a material basis but like I also said
>it's still being adjudicated upon appeal federally and will likely exculpate them from liability
>furthermore, similar allegations have been made about their involvement with OnlyFans and illegal material there but they've chosen to ignore it because it's so lucrative and many of these games and obscenity exist in a grey area of discretion therefore a public pressure campaign does have value
right that's a material basis but like I also said
>it's still being adjudicated upon appeal federally and will likely exculpate them from liability
>furthermore, similar allegations have been made about their involvement with OnlyFans and illegal material there but they've chosen to ignore it because it's so lucrative and many of these games and obscenity exist in a grey area of discretion therefore a public pressure campaign does have value
7/24/2025, 10:17:29 PM
>>716342553
yeah you're not getting Visa to open itself to litigation exposure with an email campaign or overturning obscenity laws.
the one glimmer of hope is that Visa/Mindgeek case is still being adjudicated federally and likely soon to absolve Visa of culpability for being a mere facilitator. After that they may let off
>Joe Biden appointee agreed with Visa that the company couldn't be held liability for the child sexual abuse material posted on Pornhub in so far as it only conducted routine transactions in processing payments by the site's users.
>The judge during the hearing compared holding the payment processor liable for violations of federal sex trafficking laws to dragging an electric utility into court for providing power to run the website's servers.
yeah you're not getting Visa to open itself to litigation exposure with an email campaign or overturning obscenity laws.
the one glimmer of hope is that Visa/Mindgeek case is still being adjudicated federally and likely soon to absolve Visa of culpability for being a mere facilitator. After that they may let off
>Joe Biden appointee agreed with Visa that the company couldn't be held liability for the child sexual abuse material posted on Pornhub in so far as it only conducted routine transactions in processing payments by the site's users.
>The judge during the hearing compared holding the payment processor liable for violations of federal sex trafficking laws to dragging an electric utility into court for providing power to run the website's servers.
7/24/2025, 10:17:29 PM
>>511265519
yeah you're not getting Visa to open itself to litigation exposure with an email campaign or overturning obscenity laws.
the one glimmer of hope is that Visa/Mindgeek case is still being adjudicated federally and likely soon to absolve Visa of culpability for being a mere facilitator. After that they may let off
>Joe Biden appointee agreed with Visa that the company couldn't be held liability for the child sexual abuse material posted on Pornhub in so far as it only conducted routine transactions in processing payments by the site's users.
>The judge during the hearing compared holding the payment processor liable for violations of federal sex trafficking laws to dragging an electric utility into court for providing power to run the website's servers.
yeah you're not getting Visa to open itself to litigation exposure with an email campaign or overturning obscenity laws.
the one glimmer of hope is that Visa/Mindgeek case is still being adjudicated federally and likely soon to absolve Visa of culpability for being a mere facilitator. After that they may let off
>Joe Biden appointee agreed with Visa that the company couldn't be held liability for the child sexual abuse material posted on Pornhub in so far as it only conducted routine transactions in processing payments by the site's users.
>The judge during the hearing compared holding the payment processor liable for violations of federal sex trafficking laws to dragging an electric utility into court for providing power to run the website's servers.
7/24/2025, 8:10:04 PM
>>716334942
I see, I also didn't know that
which means they are in fact still content-policing, waiting for the ruling to be publicized, stinking up to reach neutrality, or actually "auditing" the fucking thousands of shit they just banned
I see, I also didn't know that
which means they are in fact still content-policing, waiting for the ruling to be publicized, stinking up to reach neutrality, or actually "auditing" the fucking thousands of shit they just banned
Page 1