Search Results
ID: vCcnbKF2/pol/507880897#507884397
6/18/2025, 8:21:34 PM
ID: VCRmN+Dq/pol/507859280#507863562
6/18/2025, 5:06:31 PM
ID: n1A+Lgnu/pol/507709654#507710617
6/17/2025, 12:50:59 PM
>>507710124
>Good MAGA morning everyone
>Any Trump kino scheduled for today?
i hope trump gets arrested with netanyahu for violating international laws!
>Good MAGA morning everyone
>Any Trump kino scheduled for today?
i hope trump gets arrested with netanyahu for violating international laws!
ID: s/4a4BM5/pol/507696854#507697234
6/17/2025, 9:02:29 AM
>>507691029
>how does this image make you feel?
Another Israeli Act of War-Crime
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations during peace talks, violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions.
UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble.
>how does this image make you feel?
Another Israeli Act of War-Crime
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations during peace talks, violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions.
UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks (June 15, 2025) destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects (e.g., Tehran areas) violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists (e.g., Bagheri, Tehranchi) may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble.
Page 1