>>16690894
I have love this writings when I was younger.

Yet, I have to remind OP:
Both the theory of science as well as the history of science has made some progresses. There is a chance some of his arguments doesn't hold today.

The book has orginally developed as a piee of a two part work. Lakatos was supposed to write the answering part. Unfortunately, he died before.

Whised I could go back to that part of my live, when I was younger, more idealistic and want to change the system.

When you ask to understand Gödel and struggle with it, please remember that you're into a complex part of the higher mathematics.
It's no shame to struggle with understand it. In contrasts, it' good that you choice this.

In my opinion, in order to understand Gödels proof, you need two points:
1.) Understanding Gödelisierung, that means that you translate logical (and extralogical) symbols like "->","^" and so on into numbers.
On this trick, you can translate entire proofes and theorems into a sequence of numbers.
2.) Cantorization.
You make use some kind of Cantor's diagonalization on this number codes.
Like Cantor, who proves that there are no bijuncitve relation between the set of natural numbers and real numbers.

I hope it helps.

P.S.: OP is a fag.