Search Results
7/12/2025, 1:50:03 AM
>>510135407
he avoided war with iran, for one
i worry what false flag the israelis might pull off because of this within the next few months. pic related
he avoided war with iran, for one
i worry what false flag the israelis might pull off because of this within the next few months. pic related
7/4/2025, 6:30:24 PM
>>509501513
the false flag we all should be on lookout for is a pic related scenario
literally everyone is too focused on keeping the economic status quo right now since the covid "test" apparently showed that "the institutions" were "completely unprepared"
i'd be on lookout for a true Black Death scenario from 2030-2035 on out, but thx for posting this thread anyway, it was illuminating as far as how it could potentially go, as in--jeets are literally potential bio-warfare agents, just like the chinks. (((they))) could make a genetic bomb to which non-whites are more immune but which is deadly to Europeans
the false flag we all should be on lookout for is a pic related scenario
literally everyone is too focused on keeping the economic status quo right now since the covid "test" apparently showed that "the institutions" were "completely unprepared"
i'd be on lookout for a true Black Death scenario from 2030-2035 on out, but thx for posting this thread anyway, it was illuminating as far as how it could potentially go, as in--jeets are literally potential bio-warfare agents, just like the chinks. (((they))) could make a genetic bomb to which non-whites are more immune but which is deadly to Europeans
6/25/2025, 1:15:05 AM
6/23/2025, 10:08:10 PM
>>508496172
>how do you have a photo from the future?
it's called predictive programming
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/06/what-a-nuclear-attack-in-new-york-would-look-like.html
>Compared to modern nuclear missiles, which are far more powerful and complex, constructing a crude gun-type nuke is fairly straightforward. In 2002, when Joe Biden was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he asked several nuclear laboratories whether a terrorist group could construct an off-the-shelf nuclear weapon. Several months later, they gave their answer: Without resorting to any illegal activities or drawing on classified information, and using only commercially available parts, they had built a nuclear bomb that was “bigger than a breadbox but smaller than a dump truck.” To underscore the danger, Biden had them bring the device to the Senate.
The last step in the process — smuggling the weapon into the United States — would be even easier. A ten-kiloton bomb, which would release as much energy as 10,000 tons of TNT, would be only seven feet long and weigh about 1,000 pounds. It would be simple to transport such a device to America aboard a container ship, just another unseen object in a giant metal box among millions of other metal boxes floating on the ocean. Even a moderate amount of shielding would be enough to hide its radioactive signature from most detectors at shipping hubs. Consider all the naturally radioactive items that frequently trigger false alarms — bananas, ceramics, Brazil nuts... Amazingly, our detection systems have still not caught up to this threat: One would essentially have to open and visually inspect every single crate and container arriving on America’s shores. Once the container ship reached a port like Newark, terrorists would have no trouble loading the concealed bomb into the back of an unassuming white van and driving it through the Lincoln Tunnel directly into Times Square.
>how do you have a photo from the future?
it's called predictive programming
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/06/what-a-nuclear-attack-in-new-york-would-look-like.html
>Compared to modern nuclear missiles, which are far more powerful and complex, constructing a crude gun-type nuke is fairly straightforward. In 2002, when Joe Biden was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he asked several nuclear laboratories whether a terrorist group could construct an off-the-shelf nuclear weapon. Several months later, they gave their answer: Without resorting to any illegal activities or drawing on classified information, and using only commercially available parts, they had built a nuclear bomb that was “bigger than a breadbox but smaller than a dump truck.” To underscore the danger, Biden had them bring the device to the Senate.
The last step in the process — smuggling the weapon into the United States — would be even easier. A ten-kiloton bomb, which would release as much energy as 10,000 tons of TNT, would be only seven feet long and weigh about 1,000 pounds. It would be simple to transport such a device to America aboard a container ship, just another unseen object in a giant metal box among millions of other metal boxes floating on the ocean. Even a moderate amount of shielding would be enough to hide its radioactive signature from most detectors at shipping hubs. Consider all the naturally radioactive items that frequently trigger false alarms — bananas, ceramics, Brazil nuts... Amazingly, our detection systems have still not caught up to this threat: One would essentially have to open and visually inspect every single crate and container arriving on America’s shores. Once the container ship reached a port like Newark, terrorists would have no trouble loading the concealed bomb into the back of an unassuming white van and driving it through the Lincoln Tunnel directly into Times Square.
Page 1