>>64027097
>>64027431
>P-51H
This, and OP needs to be banned.

>muh Sea Fury
both the Tempest VI (Sabre) >>64034410
and Tempest II (Centaurus, in airframe which actually could handle the torque) >>64030110 far outclassed its performance, the Sea Fury was a gimped-airframe derivative for RN carrier use

>>64027028
>>64031140
>>64031159
>F4U-4
The cannon-armed -4 was a post-1946 variant.
F4U-4s that were actually deployed to the Pacific were 6×.50 armed
Yes it was a highly capable fighter bomber, rough equivalent of the USAAF's P-47M and N at that time

>>64030477
>DH.103 Hornet
This was the peak performance-wise of mid-1940s piston engined fighter development
(it didn't have the nose landing gear or high altitude systems refinement/turbosupercharging of the P-38L but much greater performance)