Search Results
7/11/2025, 4:49:24 AM
7/11/2025, 3:19:39 AM
>>510057330
Most of Christianity is a rip off of the Roman imperial cult, which is based on Alexander.
Alexander and Achilles had the two most popular cults in Rome, the tent supports of Alexander were venerated at the temple of Mars Ultor. After the battle of actium (which Augustus attributed to Alexander, crowning him in golden laurels), all Roman emperors inherited Pharaonic titles, continuing from Alexander.
σωτὴρ τῆς οἰκουμένης (sōtēr tēs oikoumenēs) 'saviour of the world' is a greek heroic title applied to many generals, that came to prominence when applied to Caesar in the cult of oikoumenos. It was ripped off by Christians.
Divus Filius, 'son of the god' was the title of Augustus, and it was stolen by Christians. It's not meaningfully different from the title applied to Jesus (filius dei).
Dominus Noster 'our lord' was a title of Domitan. Catholicism is a larp of Christianity without the based pagan metaphysics. Baptism is a larp of pagan epiphanies and initiation rites without anything happening, just play acting.
Nevertheless, Livy says that had Alexander and Rome come to blows, Rome would certainly have proved invincible (invictus) as they have over so many kings and leaders.
Most of Christianity is a rip off of the Roman imperial cult, which is based on Alexander.
Alexander and Achilles had the two most popular cults in Rome, the tent supports of Alexander were venerated at the temple of Mars Ultor. After the battle of actium (which Augustus attributed to Alexander, crowning him in golden laurels), all Roman emperors inherited Pharaonic titles, continuing from Alexander.
σωτὴρ τῆς οἰκουμένης (sōtēr tēs oikoumenēs) 'saviour of the world' is a greek heroic title applied to many generals, that came to prominence when applied to Caesar in the cult of oikoumenos. It was ripped off by Christians.
Divus Filius, 'son of the god' was the title of Augustus, and it was stolen by Christians. It's not meaningfully different from the title applied to Jesus (filius dei).
Dominus Noster 'our lord' was a title of Domitan. Catholicism is a larp of Christianity without the based pagan metaphysics. Baptism is a larp of pagan epiphanies and initiation rites without anything happening, just play acting.
Nevertheless, Livy says that had Alexander and Rome come to blows, Rome would certainly have proved invincible (invictus) as they have over so many kings and leaders.
7/8/2025, 1:29:13 AM
some pics from old thread
6/30/2025, 2:00:02 AM
>>509080614
My favourite thing is how all the moralising of Christianity goes out of the window and they behave exactly like jews. One Christian told me to prostitute my mother to him once. It's funny how it's all a larp. Weaponising report. Gaslighting. Wasnt your religon about truth and morality once upon a time? Lying is worse than murder to an Aryan, because it harms Being itself. To a Chrigger, it's as natural as breathing, all while behaving like faggot women with emotional appeals and gay social signalling.
My favourite thing is how all the moralising of Christianity goes out of the window and they behave exactly like jews. One Christian told me to prostitute my mother to him once. It's funny how it's all a larp. Weaponising report. Gaslighting. Wasnt your religon about truth and morality once upon a time? Lying is worse than murder to an Aryan, because it harms Being itself. To a Chrigger, it's as natural as breathing, all while behaving like faggot women with emotional appeals and gay social signalling.
6/28/2025, 10:51:06 PM
>>508984659
It's evident in the chats Ive posted.
It's evident in the chats Ive posted.
6/26/2025, 1:09:41 PM
>>508775573
Untrue. But what you are saying is part of the post-Christian academic rhetoric that sees propaganda in these pious religious rites. We have to break through the narrative that has been pushed so that we never consider it legitimate.
Moreover. the Republican disposition reflects only the opinions of Suetonius himself, and not the wider Roman public, where we see they were quite devoted to the emperor even in the times of Augustus.
Towards the end of Caesar's life he was called Jupiter Julius and wore the imperial purple of the old roman kings. his followers tried to coronate him with a king's wreath. He rejected these, but only half heartedly.
Augustus permitted his worship within Rome itself. He mandated that he must be worshipped alongside dea Roma. However, later on. The perimeter of the temple affirmed worship of the divus (dead emperors) while the altar itself was dedicated to the living emperor). At no point was a dead emperor venerated without the present living emperor.
these are the flaws of academia and Christianised interpretation, particularly due to Gibbon's work that sees only empty propaganda in it, due to the Christian narrative that Rome was 'saved'
By the time of Claudius, they removed Roma entirely. This occurred in Britannia.
Then later British kings in the early middle ages referenced Rome and their divine kingship. It strongly impressed a form of embodied maiestas in the ruler across all of Western Europe evident
This is getting a bit dense for a 4chan thread, but archaeology shows the most pure emperor worship occurred in Western provinces.
Wiki says it must be reappraised:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_imperial_cult
This essay goes into archeology, and how more pure emperor worship occurred in the Western provinces, because Rome itself and the East didn't need to, as it was already part of the sacred body. The establishment of formal cult occurred much later
https://x.com/everettmmxx/status/1934039828800139623
Untrue. But what you are saying is part of the post-Christian academic rhetoric that sees propaganda in these pious religious rites. We have to break through the narrative that has been pushed so that we never consider it legitimate.
Moreover. the Republican disposition reflects only the opinions of Suetonius himself, and not the wider Roman public, where we see they were quite devoted to the emperor even in the times of Augustus.
Towards the end of Caesar's life he was called Jupiter Julius and wore the imperial purple of the old roman kings. his followers tried to coronate him with a king's wreath. He rejected these, but only half heartedly.
Augustus permitted his worship within Rome itself. He mandated that he must be worshipped alongside dea Roma. However, later on. The perimeter of the temple affirmed worship of the divus (dead emperors) while the altar itself was dedicated to the living emperor). At no point was a dead emperor venerated without the present living emperor.
these are the flaws of academia and Christianised interpretation, particularly due to Gibbon's work that sees only empty propaganda in it, due to the Christian narrative that Rome was 'saved'
By the time of Claudius, they removed Roma entirely. This occurred in Britannia.
Then later British kings in the early middle ages referenced Rome and their divine kingship. It strongly impressed a form of embodied maiestas in the ruler across all of Western Europe evident
This is getting a bit dense for a 4chan thread, but archaeology shows the most pure emperor worship occurred in Western provinces.
Wiki says it must be reappraised:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_imperial_cult
This essay goes into archeology, and how more pure emperor worship occurred in the Western provinces, because Rome itself and the East didn't need to, as it was already part of the sacred body. The establishment of formal cult occurred much later
https://x.com/everettmmxx/status/1934039828800139623
6/24/2025, 2:44:08 AM
>>508525008
The institutions are pagan-founded institutions, rooted in pagan conceptions of the divine and practices.
The institutions are pagan-founded institutions, rooted in pagan conceptions of the divine and practices.
Page 1