Search Results
7/12/2025, 3:35:15 PM
>>510167814
>The farmer who paid to rent the land did so voluntarily. The landowner who rented the land agreed to allow its use for a fixed rate and both parties benefited. No government needed to be involved.
I never volunteered to have the purchasing power of my income or savings continually reduced because third parties (borrowers) keep borrowing fictional yet spendable amounts of legal tender from privately owned and controlled businesses (banks) which have as their business model and engage in legalised fraud (banking).
Yet without this system of legalised fraud and perpetual impoverishment of most of the population, having a for-financial-profit operated economy would be mathematically impossible.
You leve in Delulu land where the money for the profits exists and financial profits are mathematically possible without literally printing them. Or in the Delulusquared land where people will start businesses which make and do real things, knowing for a fact they will not be financially profitable, because, by doing so, they will marginally increase the purchasing power of their own money in the future. But not enough to compensate for their financial loss or to provide a stream of income they can live on.
I think your problem is you can't visualise, conceptualise, imagine stuff in your head. Like shapes, wireframes, flowcharts, flows etc. I can. Which is why I understand. You can't. Which is why you keep regurgitating the farts of dead old jews who were limited hangouts and fake and gay controlled opposition to keep us on the plantation of monetary systems and capitalism. Who made sure to always coom-plain about central banks but not any other aspect of capitalism. And that Rothbard kike was of the opinion people can be property.
And here you are just mindlessly regurgitating their propaganda slop because thinking be hard.
Sad. MANY such cases.
>The farmer who paid to rent the land did so voluntarily. The landowner who rented the land agreed to allow its use for a fixed rate and both parties benefited. No government needed to be involved.
I never volunteered to have the purchasing power of my income or savings continually reduced because third parties (borrowers) keep borrowing fictional yet spendable amounts of legal tender from privately owned and controlled businesses (banks) which have as their business model and engage in legalised fraud (banking).
Yet without this system of legalised fraud and perpetual impoverishment of most of the population, having a for-financial-profit operated economy would be mathematically impossible.
You leve in Delulu land where the money for the profits exists and financial profits are mathematically possible without literally printing them. Or in the Delulusquared land where people will start businesses which make and do real things, knowing for a fact they will not be financially profitable, because, by doing so, they will marginally increase the purchasing power of their own money in the future. But not enough to compensate for their financial loss or to provide a stream of income they can live on.
I think your problem is you can't visualise, conceptualise, imagine stuff in your head. Like shapes, wireframes, flowcharts, flows etc. I can. Which is why I understand. You can't. Which is why you keep regurgitating the farts of dead old jews who were limited hangouts and fake and gay controlled opposition to keep us on the plantation of monetary systems and capitalism. Who made sure to always coom-plain about central banks but not any other aspect of capitalism. And that Rothbard kike was of the opinion people can be property.
And here you are just mindlessly regurgitating their propaganda slop because thinking be hard.
Sad. MANY such cases.
Page 1