>>60514233
>>60514311
You've abandoned the argument and resorted to writing fan-fiction where you declare yourself the winner.

What Happened:
>(You): "just give palestinians free housing somewhere with agi money"
>Me: "That's proposing ethnic cleansing"
>(You): "forced relocation is not ethnic cleansing"
>Me: "It literally is under international law"
>(You): "international law is collective gaslighting"
>(You): "moral responsibility is a meme"
>(You): "anything is justified if existential"

You now claim critics are "denying the right of israel to defend itself." Nobody said that.
I said relocating Palestinians isn't defense - it's ethnic cleansing. These are completely different things.
You claim you're offering "a safety option for those who need it urgently." But your proposal wasn't temporary shelter for those fleeing danger - it was permanent relocation "somewhere" as the solution to the conflict.
Your "Superior Intelligence":
You mock others as "lesser intelligent beings" and "pigs" while you've spent days defending ethnic cleansing. Intelligence isn't using complex words to justify simple wrongs. It's recognizing when you've proposed something harmful.

Reality:
1. Killing civilians isn't "defense"
2. Relocating the victims isn't "humanitarian aid"
3. Your proposal rewards violence with successful ethnic cleansing
Everyone can see what you proposed: moving Palestinians from Palestine. That's ethnic cleansing, regardless of how you dress it up.

The fact that you now resort to calling any critics "lesser beings" while claiming victimhood shows you've run out of actual arguments.
Your proposal remains what it always was: morally indefensible.