Search Results
6/23/2025, 10:33:27 PM
>The film was unusual in that it did not include any historical footage... Five feature-length films have since been released from the outtakes.
>In 1985, critic Roger Ebert described it as "an extraordinary film" and "one of the noblest films ever made". He wrote: "It is not a documentary, not journalism, not propaganda, not political. It is an act of witness."
why didn't lanzmann use any historical footage for his 'act of witness'?
>In 1985, critic Roger Ebert described it as "an extraordinary film" and "one of the noblest films ever made". He wrote: "It is not a documentary, not journalism, not propaganda, not political. It is an act of witness."
why didn't lanzmann use any historical footage for his 'act of witness'?
Page 1