>>22810901
>not pozzed
not by today's standards, no. there was still a reasonable amoutn of blacked and whatnot
>classic american looking women
not only were they classic looking but they were just hotter in general. maybe it was because they were all natural and so only the naturally hot ones could make it. even in the 2000s which i think was the peak of western porn (and maybe jav, though i think jav peaked in the 2010s) the women were incredibly hot. way, way hotter than the women in porn today
>good shots and angles
absolutely not. they got a bit better in the 2000s and much better in the 2010s, but camera angles and shots in retro porn were fucking garbage. and so were the cameras. i do have a soft spot for late 90s to early 2000s porn though, because of the warm sepia tones that were going on. they really added to the hotness somehow, in ways i can't explain

tldr: old and older porn was better, yes, but it wasn't perfect