Search Results
ID: XabCwiIh/pol/511239716#511252377
7/24/2025, 9:27:39 PM
6/22/2025, 4:19:39 PM
ID: qj8/Rpcs/pol/508094960#508097556
6/20/2025, 5:11:18 PM
>>508094960
>In few years retards will begin to notice
"....two more weeks and the streets will be overflowing with the bodies of dead or dying vaxxies. Two more weeks!"
You've been saying this since December 2020
>In few years retards will begin to notice
"....two more weeks and the streets will be overflowing with the bodies of dead or dying vaxxies. Two more weeks!"
You've been saying this since December 2020
6/19/2025, 7:27:48 PM
Broadsheet newspapers mostly (obviously online). Never did like tabloids and most podcasters etc are like listening to fucking tabloids mixed up with a peculiar virtual friend experience.
The times
New york times
Washington post
Guardian
Wall street journal
Financial times
Reuters and associated press, obviously.
Magazines like the economist, the week, new statesman, the atlantic, times literary supplement, new york review of books (both have current affairs)
Bbc radio (radio 4, world service)
I prefer to read about current affairs or listen to the radio.
I use "bypass pay wall clean" which gives access to most publications.
I honestly think the emergence of non "legacy" online media is massively overrated and largely caters to man children. Social media is cancer as a news source.
I remember when the internet was hailed as a force of liberation. Something that would usher in new forms of democracy, deeper meaning, and greater equality. We were promised access to unimaginable knowledge, knowledge that would set us free. The voiceless would finally be heard. We would be liberated! The emptiness of our post–Cold War, post-religious, post-industrial, postmodern lives would finally be filled—with purpose, with connection—thanks to the internet.
What a farce. The internet is a sham. Nothing but smoke and mirrors. The internet is humbug.
Ballard was right. It will primarily be used to serve our voyeuristic desires for sex and violence. Gooning and gore.
Fuck you.
The times
New york times
Washington post
Guardian
Wall street journal
Financial times
Reuters and associated press, obviously.
Magazines like the economist, the week, new statesman, the atlantic, times literary supplement, new york review of books (both have current affairs)
Bbc radio (radio 4, world service)
I prefer to read about current affairs or listen to the radio.
I use "bypass pay wall clean" which gives access to most publications.
I honestly think the emergence of non "legacy" online media is massively overrated and largely caters to man children. Social media is cancer as a news source.
I remember when the internet was hailed as a force of liberation. Something that would usher in new forms of democracy, deeper meaning, and greater equality. We were promised access to unimaginable knowledge, knowledge that would set us free. The voiceless would finally be heard. We would be liberated! The emptiness of our post–Cold War, post-religious, post-industrial, postmodern lives would finally be filled—with purpose, with connection—thanks to the internet.
What a farce. The internet is a sham. Nothing but smoke and mirrors. The internet is humbug.
Ballard was right. It will primarily be used to serve our voyeuristic desires for sex and violence. Gooning and gore.
Fuck you.
Page 1