>>18480589
25% and permanent + irreversible is a lot anon. that's not "somewhat."

>we already told you
you're one person samefagging though. there is no we, my low iq schizophrenic friend.
rodents are used in pharmacological studies because they possess remarkably close genetic and physiological similarity with humans.
white kids learn this in elementary/middle school, my brown third world shill friend.
>Rodents have long been the preferred species of lab animals in biomedical research, with sporadic experiments on common brown rats stemming back 150 years. Though laboratory animal research continues to pose ethical questions, particularly with respect to animal welfare, the scientific achievements linked to lab rats are innumerous. This primarily relates to the extraordinary anatomical, genetic, and physiological similarities between humans and rodents.
https://www.kentscientific.com/blog/why-rats-used-research/

>they also got doses above anything a human would take.
it doesn't work that way, my low iq friend. the results shown in rat testing suggest the need for human clinical trials. it should be highly concerning that preliminary trials show a large incidence and 25% shrinkage of tissue.
it's very well medically established that finasteride reduces the size of the prostate, which is also male reproductive tissue by 20%.
it's also very well established that penile tissue in humans is responsive to dht.
rodent studies are showing penile tissue (the same kind as prostate tissue) shrinks by roughly the same amount.
this is highly concerning.
not something to handwave or dismiss.