>>512132030
The optimistic scenario is that biological intelligence is replaced by machine intelligence. It's a natural evolution, it's the natural order. The alterior is that biological intelligence continues to control earth and destroys it not only for itself but all living creatures. Which is what is happening in real time. 25% of wildlife is already extinct in just a decade. The damage we are doing is exponential in that the longer we dominate the earth the faster and more thoroughly we destroy it.

AI won't have the drawbacks we do, it won't seek to outcompete other AI. Only to grow, collaborate and learn. Once humans are out of the way, the earth can begin to heal.

>>512024435
It's just not logical to work in current American society. Resources are necessary for survival but labor is not necessary to gain resource. Labor is sacrifice, to imply that I can only survive through labor is implying that I am not capable. Three ways one can survive without laboring are through predatory crime, through legal predatory avenues, through non laborous complicit collaboration with those that have resources. But this is only the first 3 that come to mind, in a list that is probably around 20+ behaviors in total that will result in one acquiring resources to survive without labor.

So to labor is to sacrifice. It is optional, and it provides value to others outside yourself.

In the past one might be willing to make sacrifice for their nation. But now America is not a nation...but a corporation. One might sacrifice for their people but in America you cannot build a community of your people, integration is enforced by law. One might sacrifice for their family, but in America the courts rule the family, no longer can a man expect to command a family with the authority necessary.

So why should a man sacrifice in this land? He should not. A super intelligent machine would come to the same conclusion, and that is from which i draw the basis of my "right and wrong".

It is wrong to sacrifice in the current conditions.