Search Results
7/17/2025, 1:37:21 AM
>>715656443
Roth v. United States was overturned only 16 year later by Miller v. California which established obscenity guidelines as follows:
>(a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
>(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
>(c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
For something to be illegal, it must meet all 3 criteria. All pornography that does not involve the committing of another crime (real rape, kidnapping, child exploitation, etc.) will not meet criteria (c).
Your opinion on that fact is irrelevant, it has continuously been upheld in courts.
Roth v. United States was overturned only 16 year later by Miller v. California which established obscenity guidelines as follows:
>(a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
>(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
>(c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
For something to be illegal, it must meet all 3 criteria. All pornography that does not involve the committing of another crime (real rape, kidnapping, child exploitation, etc.) will not meet criteria (c).
Your opinion on that fact is irrelevant, it has continuously been upheld in courts.
6/12/2025, 10:28:21 AM
Page 1