>>17836639
claiming an ideological motivation of the early Viking attacks seems like complete speculation to me. And the motivations are immediately obivous: Push "Christians bad" which is always a fan-favorite in academia and it tries to strengthen the believe that violence always is a reaction to some injustice. There is no way that Vikings just raided coastal towns for plunder, sex, glory and blood-lust, they were actually freedom fighters in disguise.

>>529354632
>he touched grass
uhhhh I wasn't prepared for this xisters... our response?

>>508567474
>The kike sees a white woman and thinks "rape"

>>508391666
Thanks for the heads up, Beelzebub