>>40629293
>no human types like you do.

lol, what does that even mean? Are you just used to debating fucking retards? You all have confirmation bias so you're predetermined to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you.

What refute? You have posed ridiculous possibilities beyond the reach of current technology.
Just watch the video where the guy does the debunking. It's so fucking obvious the guy was real. You're all defensive about this but you can't make a case for what you believe. You just choose the most insane shit and you dive right in. Why? What leads you to believe you're anywhere near the truth? I wish I could figure out what you people really think the world consists of. Must be far more exciting than the mundane existence we actually inhabit.
And all the incel stuff makes sense. Normal people with jobs and friends and family don't wander down these rabbit holes. This stuff is so laughable even Joe Rogan and his cronies would dismiss it.
Is it just some childlike desire for magic? What drives you to open your brain to such unrealistic nonsense? Really?
I'm sorry I can't help insulting you guys a little, but you're all righteous and defensive as if you're actually in a real argument. I guess I just refuse to see you as actually that dumb. I keep expecting you to drop the charade and say "aw, it's just fun to think about as a hypothetical."
But no, you genuinely think 'AI' is this thing that does stuff to trick us. A working, sinister entity with motivations.

And when pressed to further debate this stuff you start in now that I'm a federal agent or a bot. You fucking asshole. How the fuck can you not tell I'm a person who's trying to get somewhere with this?
>that's just what a bot would say.

Really? So you think we're there? Then why doesn't the bot type like a fucking retard like you guys? wouldn't i write like this with no punctuation or capitalization to try and emulate the way you lazy fuckers write donchathink