Search Results
7/9/2025, 9:29:29 AM
>>509901273
>No, you have Protestantism to thank for mass immigration in Europe
Really?
You might be onto something there but WHO are they in cahoots with? picrel
> the Irish to thank in the USA who ushered in the 1965 immigration act which lead to non white immigration in an effort to take power from the WASP elites.
It was the Irish was it? Are you really sure about that?
>In dismissing my argument that Jewish organizations have been disproportionately influential in U.S. immigration policy, Abraham Miller fails to confront the data compiled in my 1998 book “The Culture of Critique,” which also describes changes in academic attitudes on race critical to passage of the 1965 Immigration Act (“The Theory Behind That Charlottesville Slogan,” op-ed, April 3). It was absolutely understood by both restrictionists and antirestrictionists in Congress that Jewish organizations spearheaded opposition against the 1924 law’s national origins, despite little public support. Jewish organizations also organized, funded and performed most of the work of a variety of umbrella organizations aimed at combating the 1924 law. The 1965 reform was thus not the result of popular pressure but rather of a 40-year program of activism.
>Rep. Michael Feighan did indeed shape family based immigration in the 1965 law. But family based, rather than skills-based immigration, had been advocated by Jewish organizations since the 1920's.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jewish-organizations-had-a-role-in-1965-act-1523374146
All I'm seeing is further proof that Catholicism was the vanguard protecting me and my people, meanwhile protestants and jews have done everything possible to turn this world into hell on Earth.
>No, you have Protestantism to thank for mass immigration in Europe
Really?
You might be onto something there but WHO are they in cahoots with? picrel
> the Irish to thank in the USA who ushered in the 1965 immigration act which lead to non white immigration in an effort to take power from the WASP elites.
It was the Irish was it? Are you really sure about that?
>In dismissing my argument that Jewish organizations have been disproportionately influential in U.S. immigration policy, Abraham Miller fails to confront the data compiled in my 1998 book “The Culture of Critique,” which also describes changes in academic attitudes on race critical to passage of the 1965 Immigration Act (“The Theory Behind That Charlottesville Slogan,” op-ed, April 3). It was absolutely understood by both restrictionists and antirestrictionists in Congress that Jewish organizations spearheaded opposition against the 1924 law’s national origins, despite little public support. Jewish organizations also organized, funded and performed most of the work of a variety of umbrella organizations aimed at combating the 1924 law. The 1965 reform was thus not the result of popular pressure but rather of a 40-year program of activism.
>Rep. Michael Feighan did indeed shape family based immigration in the 1965 law. But family based, rather than skills-based immigration, had been advocated by Jewish organizations since the 1920's.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jewish-organizations-had-a-role-in-1965-act-1523374146
All I'm seeing is further proof that Catholicism was the vanguard protecting me and my people, meanwhile protestants and jews have done everything possible to turn this world into hell on Earth.
Page 1