>>510847079
>>510853365
>how inanely unaware women are
Women are extremelu solipsistic. Very few are capable of simulating accurately how other dissimilar human beings think.

I have a theory that this is due to their historic biological niche of a trophy:
There are mass graves from the pre-historic European era, some being really big even by today's standard, let alone many thousands of years ago when the entire planet was like a few million people.

They feature remains from distant parts of Europe. They are thought to be remains of the victims eaten by cannibal tribes that roamed the continent and raided their less violent counterparts.

Interestingly, many of these graves are missing femaile remains.
The logic is that historically, even in the most savage, barbaric times, women were rarely slaughtered and were almost always taken as war brides. It makes sense since biologically uterus was the bottleneck for the tribe's reproductive rate (the number of women, not the men, defines how quickly the tribe can grow in numbers, which is very valuable for group survival in pre-modern times), so women were extremely valuable (hence why we men "evolved" to simp for them and tolerate a lot from them that we would not tolerate from men -- it's not just cultural: the tribes were men had short fuse towards women were outbred by men who tamed their responses to women's BS).

Since they were mostly protected from the violence of the conflicts, women never had the evolutionary pressure to select for traits that would help them predict how the dissimilar/foreign enemy might behave, which are useful for those in war, but not for those who never become the victims of war. So, they are biologically incapable to understand dissimilar beings.

Women just live live on easy mode, even in the Neolithic period.