Search Results
7/9/2025, 10:17:26 PM
>>81769825
>ect ect ect
My theory to add on is that I think races who have uglier and or manish looing faced women tend to develop larger backsides compared to races who's women are more conventially attractive and go about developing larger breasts instead. Sex via doggy style is more animalistic in nature, take and be taken, while front facing sex is much more akin to making love. Both of which I note as recreational rather than the sole purpose of babymaking. The more animalistic the sex the less pair bonding that front facing sex offers to the parents of young. The stats and stereotypes align well with my theory. Look at any society with big bottom girls and you most likely are also looking at a third world country, while the direct contrast can be said about societies with larger breasted women, and the first world. The sheer love making eclipses any fucking sex that is easily replaceable by fucking a darkie in the streetcorner for $80.
>ect ect ect
My theory to add on is that I think races who have uglier and or manish looing faced women tend to develop larger backsides compared to races who's women are more conventially attractive and go about developing larger breasts instead. Sex via doggy style is more animalistic in nature, take and be taken, while front facing sex is much more akin to making love. Both of which I note as recreational rather than the sole purpose of babymaking. The more animalistic the sex the less pair bonding that front facing sex offers to the parents of young. The stats and stereotypes align well with my theory. Look at any society with big bottom girls and you most likely are also looking at a third world country, while the direct contrast can be said about societies with larger breasted women, and the first world. The sheer love making eclipses any fucking sex that is easily replaceable by fucking a darkie in the streetcorner for $80.
Page 1