>>4431565
whats the point? jerking off to gimmicks that marginally improve 1/100 building corner photos and "equivalence" that says in theory if no one looked too closely a full frame camera might take a photo that could feasibly pass for micro four thirds if it were not directly compared to a micro four thirds camera taking a photo in the same situation, and the FF photographer were not allowed to lower the shutter speed, use shallower DOF, or edit much for some reason?