Search Results
7/13/2025, 7:04:55 AM
>>510239159
If he releases it redacted, they say he's hiding his name. If he releases it unredacted and his name isn't there they'll say it's fake. There's no option of releasing it where his critics say "okay we were wrong". That's why this outrage over him not doing it rings hollow on the part of many people.
If he releases it redacted, they say he's hiding his name. If he releases it unredacted and his name isn't there they'll say it's fake. There's no option of releasing it where his critics say "okay we were wrong". That's why this outrage over him not doing it rings hollow on the part of many people.
7/8/2025, 3:51:40 AM
Wow this thread sure died fast after OP got caught lackin' the dual existence he tried to fake.
7/5/2025, 1:33:56 AM
>>509532049
How hot are the projects, spearchucker?
How hot are the projects, spearchucker?
7/3/2025, 11:48:16 PM
>Just say you believe Q was real.
Oh, okay. You're one of these faggots who divides people into
>either you agree with me entirely
>or you worship the thing I don't like
No more (You)s for false dichotomy kikes. I stated my actual opinion. It's your choice whether or not to insist that you know what people actually believe, even though it's not true.
Oh, okay. You're one of these faggots who divides people into
>either you agree with me entirely
>or you worship the thing I don't like
No more (You)s for false dichotomy kikes. I stated my actual opinion. It's your choice whether or not to insist that you know what people actually believe, even though it's not true.
7/2/2025, 9:58:33 PM
>by the guy who left a dead baby bear in Central Park?
First off, you're a tedious piece of shit and your thread is made in bad faith, so let's get that out of the way, nigger.
Secondly, I'm not a fan of AI being used to "solve" everything, especially since it's not even actually artificial intelligence, so the "AI" moniker is bullshit. Thirdly, I AM in favor of ending animal testing wherever it can be done, so yes, there is an upside to this potential development. If you're expecting us to make an informed conclusion based on a fucking sound byte, see my first point, nigger.
Now talk about brainworms and some other bullshit to smear the guy who has already gotten some of the poison out of our food. I admit, I didn't used to like RFK Jr just out of knee-jerk "he's a left winger" shit, and then once I sat down and read about his career, I was stunned that the Kennedy family could actually produce someone who contributed to the preservation of nature as much as he has. He is literally the kind of lawyer they make movies about. Our waterways are objectively healthier than they would have been without him. So eat a dick and join the 41%, troon.
First off, you're a tedious piece of shit and your thread is made in bad faith, so let's get that out of the way, nigger.
Secondly, I'm not a fan of AI being used to "solve" everything, especially since it's not even actually artificial intelligence, so the "AI" moniker is bullshit. Thirdly, I AM in favor of ending animal testing wherever it can be done, so yes, there is an upside to this potential development. If you're expecting us to make an informed conclusion based on a fucking sound byte, see my first point, nigger.
Now talk about brainworms and some other bullshit to smear the guy who has already gotten some of the poison out of our food. I admit, I didn't used to like RFK Jr just out of knee-jerk "he's a left winger" shit, and then once I sat down and read about his career, I was stunned that the Kennedy family could actually produce someone who contributed to the preservation of nature as much as he has. He is literally the kind of lawyer they make movies about. Our waterways are objectively healthier than they would have been without him. So eat a dick and join the 41%, troon.
Page 1