Search Results
6/19/2025, 1:45:02 AM
>>17774832
Can you post evidence suggesting that pederasty was banned during the Athenian golden age?
>>17774836
>their preferred method of sex causes infection
Pederasty isn't anywhere near as much of a disease vector as adult-adult homosexuality because (1) boys haven't accumulated disease unlike adult homosexuals, (2) there are clearly defined sexual roles (the fact that adult-homosexuals both get penetrated by and penetrate other men is a primary disease vector), (3) boys can't ejaculate/don't have the same quantity of ejaculate as men, (4) penetration is less frequent in man/boy and even boy/boy relationships, and (5) adult-homosexuals engage in an obscene amount of dangerous sexual contact. So again, you are promoting the Jewish psyop that pederasty and faggotry are of the same kind.
Women are massive whores who basically become petri dishes that carry the diseases of all their past partners. Boys are much cleaner than women. Most women have STDs.
>>17774840
>It is titled greek-love
Doesn't matter, those are accurate translations of historical documents.
>softcore of a child being raped on the home page nigga
You mean artwork on Greek pottery from 490 BC?
>>17774848
>The historical record shows us that non-sexual pederasty was very common
No it doesn't. Non-sexual pederasty is an oxymoron; the "non-sexual erotic love of boys" makes no sense. Even the ideal promoted by philosophers assumes the man is sexually attracted to the boy.
>There is no difference in terms of the orientation of a man who has sex with other men and a man who rapes little boys
Attraction to adult men and attraction to boys are entirely separate phenomenon. Boy-lovers are known to be masculine, virtuous men with excellent aesthetic sensibilities. Alexander the Great had sexual relations with women as well as boys, does this make him a faggot?
Having high testosterone levels and evolved aesthetic sensibilities what primarily causes attraction to boys.
Can you post evidence suggesting that pederasty was banned during the Athenian golden age?
>>17774836
>their preferred method of sex causes infection
Pederasty isn't anywhere near as much of a disease vector as adult-adult homosexuality because (1) boys haven't accumulated disease unlike adult homosexuals, (2) there are clearly defined sexual roles (the fact that adult-homosexuals both get penetrated by and penetrate other men is a primary disease vector), (3) boys can't ejaculate/don't have the same quantity of ejaculate as men, (4) penetration is less frequent in man/boy and even boy/boy relationships, and (5) adult-homosexuals engage in an obscene amount of dangerous sexual contact. So again, you are promoting the Jewish psyop that pederasty and faggotry are of the same kind.
Women are massive whores who basically become petri dishes that carry the diseases of all their past partners. Boys are much cleaner than women. Most women have STDs.
>>17774840
>It is titled greek-love
Doesn't matter, those are accurate translations of historical documents.
>softcore of a child being raped on the home page nigga
You mean artwork on Greek pottery from 490 BC?
>>17774848
>The historical record shows us that non-sexual pederasty was very common
No it doesn't. Non-sexual pederasty is an oxymoron; the "non-sexual erotic love of boys" makes no sense. Even the ideal promoted by philosophers assumes the man is sexually attracted to the boy.
>There is no difference in terms of the orientation of a man who has sex with other men and a man who rapes little boys
Attraction to adult men and attraction to boys are entirely separate phenomenon. Boy-lovers are known to be masculine, virtuous men with excellent aesthetic sensibilities. Alexander the Great had sexual relations with women as well as boys, does this make him a faggot?
Having high testosterone levels and evolved aesthetic sensibilities what primarily causes attraction to boys.
Page 1