>>511389853
Not a legal expert but limited immunity while she answered their questions only means that any self-incriminating evidence she provides won’t be used against her. It has nothing to do with her conviction. It has nothing to do with a pardon. The very idea that Trump would pardon a woman convicted of procuring underage girls for sexual abuse and also convicted of sometimes joining in this sexual abuse is pretty laughable. Even his most fanatic supporter would abandon him.

So, they visited Jizz Lane to answer some questions and provided her with limited immunity. What’s it all about? Distraction. A very desperate attempt make this whole Epstein thing go away for good. Will it work? Maybe, but I think the odds are against it.

Why do women keep harping on men for not having close male friendships, even though this is what close male friendships look like apparently