>>16719105
>I agree it's unnecessary. But that there is at least a minor benefit is uncontested.
Have you seen the non minor issues I listed earlier?
>meta-analysis
>https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9987140/
did you even read your own study?
"The prevalence of pineal gland calcification in this study was 61.65%"