Search Results
6/12/2025, 12:41:52 PM
>>148980247
This nig apparently is so underaged that he never knew Google Book pre-trial. These days, all it's good for is that you can access billions of foot notes, which makes it a useful references to Academic conference papers and other grey literature not listed anywhere else. Of the actual text itself, it generally won't show you enough to replace actual purchase of the product in any manner.
>and given AI gens create their images completely from scratch via digital noise and algorithms, they're nothing if not transformative.
They do not. Training data needs to be gathered and processed. You can't produce a Mickey Mouse without having first harvested copyright-protected material of the related companies to train your image gen on.
The image gen then uses it to generate something that's clearly an equivalent of the images you harvested first, which is actively being used in place of Disney IP.
It's "Our AI can generate Tale of Earthsee, Ghibli-version-like images!" (what it actually does, what it's sold and used as) vs "our AI can identify and find somebody referencing to a place where Ghibli-like images are to be found" (what Google book does) here.
This nig apparently is so underaged that he never knew Google Book pre-trial. These days, all it's good for is that you can access billions of foot notes, which makes it a useful references to Academic conference papers and other grey literature not listed anywhere else. Of the actual text itself, it generally won't show you enough to replace actual purchase of the product in any manner.
>and given AI gens create their images completely from scratch via digital noise and algorithms, they're nothing if not transformative.
They do not. Training data needs to be gathered and processed. You can't produce a Mickey Mouse without having first harvested copyright-protected material of the related companies to train your image gen on.
The image gen then uses it to generate something that's clearly an equivalent of the images you harvested first, which is actively being used in place of Disney IP.
It's "Our AI can generate Tale of Earthsee, Ghibli-version-like images!" (what it actually does, what it's sold and used as) vs "our AI can identify and find somebody referencing to a place where Ghibli-like images are to be found" (what Google book does) here.
Page 1