>>4446002
That's shitty scanning+sharpening for print for you.
>>4446051
Near Tampere, Finland
>>4445991
So it's bad that you use the tools you choose for the art you want? Are you actually autistic or retarded? That kit costs sub 1k now afaik.
>>4445993
You are in denial of sensor mattering that much to the end result, and trolling because you still seem to think the matter was the camera instead of yourself.
>>4446020
LMAO sounds about right

PSA to gearfags here, optics matter more. And don't shoot in bad light and expect good results.