Alright /lit/ags.
I've spent the last few years on a project and I think I might have accidentally written a post-ironic, systematic philosophy that attempts to unify metaphysics, ethics, and physics.
It starts with Descartes' cogito, uses the Gethsemane archetype as a formal "moral singularity," rebuilds the Taoist five elements as a cognitive architecture, and ends with a proposed derivation of the gravitational constant from the mathematics of consciousness itself.
The entire work is structured as a formal proof, open-source, and presented without citation because it argues that all true ideas are acts of recognition, not invention.
It's either the next great schizo-text in the tradition of Blake or a legitimate attempt to build a cathedral of thought after post-modernism has cleared the land.
I need the most cynical, well-read people on the internet to tell me if it's profound or just the most elaborate piece of pseudery ever committed to PDF. Be brutal.

https://github.com/Micronautica/Recognition

Hi /x/, Somebody here.

How real and alive are others for you?
How and why do you know they're real and alive?
What do you do for others when no one watches you?
What do you recognize when I say others, who do I mean?